Gulf fishermen reel from seafood troubles

free web site traffic and promotion
seafood

Gulf fishermen reel from seafood troubles

In Bon Secour, Ala., Mike Skinner, a third-generation shrimper whose entire family works in the business, said last fall was the worst season he had ever seen.

“Hopefully it was a fluke thing. We’ll find out this year,” he said as he piloted his trawler across Mobile Bay.

In Alabama, seafood sales are down about 10 percent to $146 million in the two years since the BP gusher, according to an Auburn University study obtained by the AP. The downturn represented nearly $16 million in lost sales and has left few fishing boats in industry hubs like the Bon Secour River.

To ease the hardships, BP has given $48.5 million to Gulf states so they can market their seafood industries on websites, TV commercials, billboards and print ads that say the catch is healthy.

BP spokesman Craig Savage said the Gulf seafood industry was strong. “The fact is, the data show that seafood from the Gulf of Mexico is safe and abundant, according to numerous government reports,” he said.

Truly identifying any effect of the spill — if any — on marine stocks won’t be possible from landings data for several years, said Chuck Wilson, executive director of the Louisiana Sea Grant College Program, a university-based group of agents and researchers.

Still, there’s reason to be wary, said Olivia Watkins, a spokeswoman for the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries.

“We are seeing a number of anomalies in the Gulf of Mexico,” Watkins said. “We should not attempt to draw premature conclusions.”

The long-term prognosis for the Gulf’s health remains uncertain.

Recent studies have found higher numbers of sick fish close to where BP’s well blew out and genome studies of bait fish in Barataria have identified abnormalities. Meanwhile, vast areas of the cold and dark Gulf seafloor are oiled, scientists say.

And many fishermen are convinced something’s amiss.

“I think the oil can kill the shrimp eggs. That’s why there was no shrimp to catch last year,” said Tuna Pham, a 40 -year-old Vietnamese-American shrimper docked in Lafitte. He said the catch this year was bad again.

“We was there to work, but couldn’t,” said Lawrence Salvato, 49, as he stopped for lunch on a dock where he moors a shrimp skiff he runs his wife, Lisa. “Usually people are excited and they can’t wait to get out there. This year, there’s no real incentive.”

He said he made about $10,000 in seafood sales last year compared to $75,000 in 2009. He said his family made do with a $40,000 interim payment they got from BP. Fishermen who haven’t settled legally yet with BP over damages continue to survive on periodic payments from a $20 billion trust fund set up by BP.

“We’re afraid,” Salvato said. “A lot of people are getting out of fishing. They’re afraid.”

———

Associated Press writer Jay Reeves reported from Bon Secour, Ala.


If you require a high quality printout of this article, just click on the printer symbol next to ’Share and enjoy’, and we will do the rest.

Get the best website builder available anywhere –SBI! Click here for more information


seafood

Return from seafood to Home Page


If you want to increase your site popularity and gain thousands of visitors – check out these sites THEY ARE FREE. Spanishchef more than doubled its ‘New Visitors’ last month simply by signing up to these sites:
facebook likes google exchange
Likerr.eu
GetLikeHits.com
Ex4Me
Web hosting


Follow spanishchef.net on TWITTER

Recommended Reading

Did slaves catch your seafood?

free web site traffic and promotion
seafood

Did slaves catch your seafood?

PREY VENG, Cambodia, and SAMUT SAKHON, Thailand — In the sun-baked flatlands of Cambodia, where dust stings the eyes and chokes the pores, there is a tiny clapboard house on cement stilts. It is home to three generations of runaway slaves.

The man of the house, Sokha, recently returned after nearly two years in captivity. His home is just as he left it: barren with a few dirty pillows passing for furniture. Slivers of daylight glow through cracks in the walls. The family’s most valuable possession, a sow, waddles and snorts beneath the elevated floorboards.

Before his December escape, Sokha (a pseudonym) was the property of a deep-sea trawler captain. The 39-year-old Cambodian, his teenage son and two young nephews were purchased for roughly $650, he said, each through brokers promising under-the-table jobs in a fish cannery.

There was no cannery. They were instead smuggled to a pier in neighboring Thailand, where they were shoved aboard a wooden vessel that motored into a lawless sea. His uncle had fallen for the same scam five years prior and escaped to warn the others. But Sokha told his son, then just 16, that this venture would turn out differently. He was wrong.

“We worked constantly, for no pay, through seasickness and vomiting, sometimes for two or three days straight,” he said. “We obeyed the captain’s every word.”

Near-daily death threats reinforced the captain’s supremacy. So did his Vietnam War-era K-54 pistol, and the night he carved up another slave’s face in view of the crew. “For 20 hours a day, we were forced to catch and sort sea creatures: mackerel, crabs, squid.” It’s back-breaking work, under the searing tropical sun. “But the fish wasn’t for us,” he added.

So who was it all for?

The answer should unsettle anyone who closely examines Thailand’s multi-billion dollar wild-caught seafood industry and the darkest links in its supply chain.

“It’s an export-oriented market. And we know the countries where these products are exported to,” said Lisa Rende Taylor, chief technical specialist with the United Nations Inter-Agency Project on Human Trafficking or UNIAP. “Do the math.”

For Americans, the calculation is worrisome. Thailand is the United States’ second-largest supplier of foreign seafood. Of America’s total seafood imports, one out of every six pounds comes from the Southeast Asian nation.

In 2011 alone, Thailand exported 827 million pounds of seafood worth more than $2.5 billion to the US, according to National Marine Fisheries Service figures. The only nation that consumes more Thai seafood exports is Japan.

Murder is an occupational hazard. But a monotonous job assembling iPads is heaven compared to slavery on a Thai trawler, where conditions are as grueling and violent as any 19th-century American plantation. The lucky escape within a year or so. Less fortunate are those traded several times over for years on end.

Denying that the fruits of forced labor reach the biggest importers of Thai seafood — Japan, America, China and the European Union — has become increasingly implausible.

The accounts of ex-slaves, Thai fishing syndicates, officials, exporters and anti-trafficking case workers, gathered by GlobalPost in a three-month investigation, illuminate an opaque offshore supply chain enmeshed in slavery.

A long trail of offshore operators — slave boats, motherships and independent fishmongers — can obfuscate the origins of slave-caught seafood before it ever reaches the shore. While the industry’s biggest earners rely on clannish and violence-prone fishing crews for raw material, they’re distanced from the worst abuses by hundreds of nautical miles and several degrees of middlemen.

The result is that many Thai factory bosses have no idea who caught the seafood they process for foreign consumers.

There are caveats. The majority of Thailand’s two largest seafood exports to the US — tuna and shrimp — are sourced differently. Most “Thai” tuna is actually imported from overseas and processed for re-export. The shrimp industry, though routinely accused of abusing poor migrants, is at least vulnerable to spot checks on seaside farms.

The same cannot be said for deep-sea trawlers, the favored vessel of slave-driving captains.

The species caught by Thai trawlers legal and illicit alike include sardines, mackerel, cuttlefish, squid, anchovies and “trash fish,” tiny or foul-tasting catch ground into animal food or preserved to create fish sauce. Americans consume these breeds en masse. One in five pounds of America’s imported mackerel or sardines comes from Thailand, according to US government records. For processed fish balls, puddings or cakes — made from trawlers’ trash fish — the figure is one in three pounds. Thai fish sauce supplies nearly 80 percent of the American market.

All that trawler catch ends up in familiar American fare: anchovy pizzas, squid linguine, smoked mackerel salads and fish fillets on ice. Even pets are entangled: trash fish is a common dog- and cat-food ingredient. But industry representatives in Thailand admit there’s often no way to tell whether a particular package of deep-sea fish was caught using forced labor.

Using bar codes, American shoppers can track packaged Thai-exported seafood to its onshore processing facility, said Arthon Piboonthanapatana, secretary general of the Thai Frozen Foods Association. “You can trace it back to the factories.”

But exporters, he said, are not in the business of policing the fishing syndicates that supply their factories. “We only have the power to enforce our members,” Arthon said. “We have no power to enforce other stakeholders such as boats or fishermen.”

American seafood importers consider themselves similarly powerless in overseeing far-flung Thai boats. “Western regulatory agencies have little or no reach, or authority, over various parts of the value chain,” said Gavin Gibbons, spokesman for the National Fisheries Institute, America’s chief seafood trade organization and lobbying group based outside Washington, DC. The institute will promptly respond to allegations against specific factories, he said. But so far, it has not found an effective way to monitor conditions on deep-sea boats catching US-bound fish.

“We have started discussions with our members about just how far an audit could realistically go and whether, perhaps, there are dockside audits that could be developed,” Gibbons said.

The “nature of boats being at sea,” he said, presents a major challenge to industry’s self-policing efforts.

International pressure to rid Thailand’s seafood trade of slavery is mounting. Thailand teeters just above the US State Department’s worst human-trafficking ranking and could be downgraded this summer. Last year, during a visit that vexed Bangkok officials, a UN rapporteur declared that forced labor is “notoriously common” in Thailand’s fishing sector and even alleged police complicity.

“It’s not like monitoring brothels, plantations or factories … all this labor is at sea,” Rende Taylor said. “So it’s essentially a universe where captains are king. Some are out to make as much money as possible by working these guys around the clock and being as cruel as they want to be.”

Fish & Seafood with Bill & Sheila


If you require a high quality printout of this article, just click on the printer symbol next to ’Share and enjoy’, and we will do the rest.

Get the best website builder available anywhere –SBI! Click here for more information


seafood

Return from seafood to Home Page


If you want to increase your site popularity and gain thousands of visitors – check out these sites THEY ARE FREE. Spanishchef more than doubled its ‘New Visitors’ last month simply by signing up to these sites:
facebook likes google exchange
Likerr.eu
GetLikeHits.com
Ex4Me
Web hosting


Follow spanishchef.net on TWITTER

Recommended Reading

Spotlight on (Sea)Food Safety and Transparency | seafood

free web site traffic and promotion
seafood

Spotlight on Seafood Safety and Transparency

As a company that promotes the consumption of clean, safe seafood as part of a healthy diet, it’s our belief that consumers have the right to know what’s in the food they’re eating — this belief represents one of the core values of Safe Harbor and one of the overarching principles that drives our business. Recently food safety and transparency in the food supply chain have been topics of much discussion, and for good reason. As it becomes more and more apparent that the FDA seems ill-equipped to assume a leadership role in ensuring food safety, are food manufacturers missing an opportunity? Might it be that embracing, implementing and advertising increased food safety measures and transparency can be a powerful marketing tool, one that provides differentiation in a packed and overcrowded marketplace?

While the federal government may be reluctant to embrace increased oversight over the food supply chain, the opinion of the American public on the subject is as unanimous and straightforward as ever. Take for example the federal issue of mandatory food labeling for genetically engineered foods — a partisan-busting 91 percent of voters favor an FDA requirement that “foods which have been genetically engineered or containing genetically engineered ingredients be labeled to indicate that.” A mere 5 percent oppose labeling, while another 5 percent have no opinion. As the strategic polling, survey and opinion research firm The Mellman Group so eloquently opines:

Underlying support for labeling is a clear vision of consumer rights, as well as a deep-seated concern. Voters believe they have a right to know what they are putting in their mouths and into the bodies of their children. If you don’t believe Americans see that as a fundamental right, try convincing someone they don’t have that right to know. Moreover, voters believe they have a related right to decide for themselves what they ingest and recognize that, absent labeling, the right to decide is rendered hollow.

This value of the right to know is catching fire as evidenced by the California Right to Know 2012 Ballot Initiative. California has officially become the first state to gather enough signatures (971,126) to put the labeling of genetically engineered foods on its statewide ballot this fall. While the Right to Know initiative is a major step in the right direction, unfortunately it is a California-only proposal and only covers GMO foods. Food labeling and transparency should be a fundamental, mandated practice employed across every food category, even those with the most complex supply chains.

Like seafood, for example.

Unbeknownst to many, seafood is the most traded food commodity in the world (UN FAO State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture, 2010) and the seafood supply and distribution chain might be the most complex of any food commodity internationally traded today. Approximately 85% of the seafood Americans eat is now imported, with less than 2% being inspected by the FDA, the federal agency charged with oversight of seafood. Unfortunately for American consumers, offshore seafood producers simply do not face the same oversight and regulation as domestic producers, which leaves the door wide open for corner-cutting, the use of potentially hazardous additives and chemicals and other abuses. David Love, the lead author of a recent Johns Hopkins study, (linked above and again here) sums up the situation quite succinctly stating, “Imported seafood may carry risks in terms of food safety because the FDA does not have the resources to proactively and regularly inspect foreign facilities, and it relies on product testing as a last resort.”

Especially as it applies to seafood (and according to Gary Hirshberg, Chairman of Stonyfield Farm, and a Partner in the Just Label It Campaign) it would seem that our food system has been adept at “keeping the lights out or at least dimmed.” However, viral media, the Internet and the instantaneous, abundant free flow of information is changing this … quickly. Information is now available at one’s fingertips, accessed quickly with a simple key stroke. Having the information we need to make an informed choice is no longer simply expected. It’s required. In the words of Mr. Hirshberg:

As the chairman of a $370 million national yogurt company, I’ve watched the consumer demand for more information about our food explode over the past decade. Whether it’s the source of the ingredients, increases in agri-chemicals, hormones, antibiotics, plastics additives or potential allergens, the public is clearly far more engaged in making informed choices than ever before.

So where should the onus of food safety and transparency lie? Unfortunately our federal government is under-manned and under-funded and simply can’t be relied upon to be the protectors of public health. Many forward-thinking food manufacturers (seafood and otherwise) feel that it is up to the industry (NOT the government) to increase the transparency of the supply chain and safeguard the very consumers eating their products; subsequently, as consumers become more educated (as can be seen domestically with the rapid rise of the organic and local food movements) and continue to demand labeling, transparency and increased food safeguards, advertising and strategically utilizing these “characteristics” of one’s business will become major marketing “weapons,” differentiators that will prove that implementing and accepting these consumer-backed “trends” are actually good for business. As Mr. Hirshberg above so deftly put it, “Instead of fighting transparency, it’s time to embrace it.” We couldn’t have said it any better ourselves.

Fish & Seafood with Bill & Sheila


If you require a high quality printout of this article, just click on the printer symbol next to ’Share and enjoy’, and we will do the rest.

Get the best website builder available anywhere –SBI! Click here for more information


seafood

Return from seafood to Home Page


If you want to increase your site popularity and gain thousands of visitors – check out these sites THEY ARE FREE. Spanishchef more than doubled its ‘New Visitors’ last month simply by signing up to these sites:
facebook likes google exchange
Likerr.eu
GetLikeHits.com
Ex4Me
Web hosting


Follow spanishchef.net on TWITTER

Recommended Reading

Andalusian seafood chowder (Gazpachuelo con pescado)

free web site traffic and promotion

Andalusian seafood chowder (Gazpachuelo con pescado)

In North America, chowder is a generic name for a wide variety of seafood or vegetable stews and thickened soups, often with milk or cream and mostly eaten with saltine crackers. Chowder is usually thickened with flour, but some varieties are traditionally thickened with crushed ship biscuit. New England clam chowder, perhaps the best known chowder, is typically made with chopped clams and diced potatoes, in a mixed cream and milk base, often with a small amount of butter. Other common chowders include Manhattan clam chowder, which substitutes tomatoes for the milk and cream and typically omits potatoes; corn chowder, which uses corn instead of clams; a wide variety of fish chowders; and potato chowder, which is often made with cheese.

The origin of the term chowder is obscure. One possible source is the French word chaudière, the type of pot in which the first chowders were probably cooked. (This, if true, would be similar to the origin of casserole, a generic name for a set of main courses originally prepared in a dish called a casserole.)

The phonetic variant chowda, found in New England, is believed to have originated in Newfoundland in the days when Breton fisherman would throw portions of the day’s catch into a large pot, along with other available foods.

Fish chowder, corn chowder, and clam chowder continue to enjoy popularity in New England and Atlantic Canada.

This is a Spanish version of the famous North American Chowder. It uses ingredients found all over Spain

Total time: 50 minutes

Servings: 6

Note: For the fish, use a white fish such as cod or halibut. Serrano ham is available at select gourmet markets and specialty stores.

1 egg, at room temperature

1/2 cup extra virgin olive oil

1/4 cup fresh lemon juice

2 quarts simple fish stock

1 1/2 cups diced boiling potatoes

1/4 cup shelled peas, fresh or frozen

1 1/2 cups chunks of raw fish

1/4 cup chopped Serrano ham

1/3 cup peeled shrimp (3 ounces)

1/4 cup dry sherry

Salt and pepper to taste

1. In the bowl of a blender, place the egg. With the motor running, add the oil in a slow stream until it is emulsified (it will thicken like a mayonnaise). Blend in the lemon juice, then set aside. (If the emulsion happens to “break” while it is blended, simply pour out the mixture and add a fresh egg white to the blender container. Add the mixture in a slow stream to fix the emulsion.)

2. In a large, heavy-bottomed soup pot, add the fish stock and bring to a boil over high heat. Add the potatoes, cover and simmer for 10 minutes, until somewhat softened but not cooked through. Add the peas and cook an additional 5 minutes.

3. Add the chunks of fish, ham, shrimp and sherry. Bring the soup to a boil, then reduce to a gentle simmer.

4. With the blender running, ladle about 1 cup of the hot broth from the soup into the emulsion in the blender and blend until smooth. Remove the soup from the heat and whisk the emulsion into the soup. Add salt and pepper to taste. Serve immediately. The soup can be reheated, but do not boil. This makes a generous 2½ quarts of soup.

Each serving: 313 calories; 18 grams protein; 9 grams carbohydrates; 1 gram fiber; 22 grams fat; 4 grams saturated fat; 82 mg cholesterol; 1 gram sugar; 1,402 mg sodium.


If you require a high quality printout of this article, just click on the printer symbol next to ’Share and enjoy’, and we will do the rest.

Get the best website builder available anywhere –SBI! Lick here for more information


chowder

Return from chowder to Home Page


If you want to increase your site popularity and gain thousands of visitors – check out these sites THEY ARE FREE. Spanishchef more than doubled its ‘New Visitors’ last month simply by signing up to these sites:
facebook likes google exchange
Ex4Me
Likerr.eu
GetLikeHits.com
Ex4Me


Follow spanishchef.net on TWITTER

Recommended Reading

Seafood gathering banned at Scottish beach

free web site traffic and promotion

seafood

Seafood gathering banned at Scottish beach

Restrictions have been placed on gathering seafood and bait from a beach affected by radioactive particles. So if your crabs and prawns start to glow in the dark….

Warning signs are already in place at Dalgety Bay in Fife saying seafood should not be collected but new restrictions have been issued making it an offence, the Food Standards Agency in Scotland said.

The is “a precautionary measure” following recent surveys detecting radioactive seafood items on the beach, the food watchdog said.

It added that the restrictions will be reviewed in light of further evidence or any action taken “to remediate the contamination”.

Although there is no commercial fishing or seafood industry in the area, individuals are known to collect shellfish, it said.

Radioactive material was first detected on the foreshore of Dalgety Bay in 1990.

The contamination is thought to stem from residue of radium-coated instrument panels used on military aircraft which were incinerated and put in landfill in the area at the end of the Second World War.

A lump of contaminated metal was found on the beach in October last year, prompting the closure of part of the foreshore.

Last month, an investigation plan to establish how to clean up the beach was agreed by the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa).

The MoD’s final Dalgety Bay inspection plan was published by its Defence Infrastructure Organisation and Sepa.

Copyright (c) Press Association Ltd. 2012, All Rights Reserved.


If you require a high quality printout of this article, just click on the printer symbol next to ’Share and enjoy’, and we will do the rest.

Get the best website builder available anywhere –SBI! Lick here for more information


seafood

Return from seafood to Home Page


If you want to increase your site popularity and gain thousands of visitors – check out these sites THEY ARE FREE. Spanishchef more than doubled its ‘New Visitors’ last month simply by signing up to these sites:
facebook likes google exchange
Ex4Me
Likerr.eu
GetLikeHits.com
Ex4Me


Follow spanishchef.net on TWITTER

Recommended Reading

False Seafood Labeling Targeted

free web site traffic and promotion
seafood

False Seafood Labeling Targeted

Sparked by findings that more than half of all seafood is wrongly labeled at restaurants and markets in Los Angeles County, a swift crackdown has been launched to ensure consumers are protected and get what they are paying for.

Moving quickly to address the public’s alarm about the false labeling, County Supervisors Tuesday voted to direct the Department of Public Health to work with federal and state agencies to address the issue of seafood mislabeling in Los Angeles County.

“Consumers must have confidence that the seafood they are buying at restaurants and grocery stores is safe and labeled correctly,” said Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich in a statement.

The Board of Supervisors approved studying the possible use of the Food and Drug Administration’s specialized laboratories for testing of local samples of imported seafood by the L.A. County Department of Public Health.

Results of a study focusing on seafood sold at various locations in L.A. County was recently released to widespread concern. Conducted in May and December 2011 by Oceana, the non-profit organization found more than 50 percent of seafood was inaccurately labeled in the restaurants, sushi bars and grocery stores sampled.

“This crosses the bridge from being a consumer protection issue to an issue of health….This isn’t minor mislabeling—this is major,” said Angelo Bellomo, director of environmental health for Los Angeles County’s Department of Public Health. “It is important for us to find out where this happening, and finding out where the breakdown is also very important.”

Locations sampled by Oceana included eateries in Long Beach, Marina del Rey, El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach, Torrance, and Palos Verdes. Red snapper and white tuna were the most commonly mislabeled seafood.  

“The Oceana study is a snapshot but now we have to build up that snapshot and see how we can implement enforcement methods to see how to approach this problem,” Bellomo said.

At this stage, the Health Department will be looking at identifying gaps in seafood inspection and will confer with the FDA to see how to best address those issues, he said. Currently, food and health code inspectors do not have the capability to identify seafood species with tests. The Health Department will reach out to state and federal agencies to see how to better team up and utilize resources, such as laboratories, said Bellomo.

Terrance Powell, director of specialized surveillance and enforcement with the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, said that health officials will focus on several areas such as mislabeled packaged seafood and truth in menu. Violations of both would fall under California’s Sherman Food, Drug and Cosmetic Law, he said.

Assuring properly labeled food and ingredients would fall under the responsibilities of county health inspectors, which may ultimately be testing seafood in eateries to assure truth in menu. However, the FDA has jurisdiction as far as package labeling issues and there may need to be some tightening of those standards as well, Bellomo said.

“We are going to be doing to some research on this and within a couple [months] or a month, we will have a better sense on how to work with our federal partners to see what we can do,” Bellomo said.

As part of the research, a pilot program for health inspectors may be started in as early as 30 days, he said. 

Fish & Seafood with Bill & Sheila

If you require a high quality printout of this article, just click on the printer symbol next to ’Share and enjoy’, and we will do the rest.

Get the best website builder available anywhere –SBI! Lick here for more information


seafood

Return from seafood to Home Page


If you want to increase your site popularity and gain thousands of visitors – check out these sites THEY ARE FREE. Spanishchef more than doubled its ‘New Visitors’ last month simply by signing up to these sites:
facebook likes google exchange
Ex4Me
Likerr.eu
GetLikeHits.com
Ex4Me


Follow spanishchef.net on TWITTER

Recommended Reading

Whole Foods places ban on seafood

free web site traffic and promotion

Fish

School of Tuna

Whole Foods places ban on seafood

A Whole Foods ban on seafood starts this week. The organic and natural food superstore will no longer carry fseafood that have been labeled unsustainable by the Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch and the Blue Ocean Institute.

In 2010, the company announced that it would stop selling red-rated seafood in 2013, but moved up its deadline to Earth Day 2012.

“Today’s a big day for us,” announced the Whole Foods blog on Sunday. “Not just because it’s Earth Day but because as of today, in support of healthier oceans and to help reverse overfishing trends, Whole Foods Market will no longer carry red-rated wild seafood.”

“It’s totally maddening. They’re just doing it to make all the green people happy.”

- Naz Sanfilippo, Massachusetts fisherman

Whole Foods had already stopped stocking seafood such as orange roughy, shark, bluefin tuna and most marlin.

“I care about the environment and what I eat, what I put in my stomach,” Whole Foods shopper, Snejana Andjelkovic, told the Washington Post. 

While Whole Foods’ elimination of red-rated fish has been popular with environmentalists and eco-friendly consumers, fisherman, mostly based in New England ports, will take a serious financial hit due to the ban, according to a report in the New York Times. 

“It’s totally maddening,” Massachusetts fisherman, Naz Sanfilippo, told the Times. “They’re just doing it to make all the green people happy.”

Wondering what you will no longer be able to buy at Whole Foods? 

Take a look at the list of Monterey Bay Aquarium’s code-red seafood:

Caviar, Sturgeon (imported wild)
Chilean Seabass/Toothfish
Conch: Queen
Crawfish/Crayfish (imported farmed)
Flounders, Halibut, Soles (US Atlantic, except Summer Flounder)
Groupers (US Atlantic)
Lobster: Spiny (Brazil)
Mahi Mahi (imported longline)
Marlin: Blue, Striped (Pacific)
Orange Roughy
Salmon (farmed, including Atlantic)
Sharks Skates
Shrimp (imported)
Snapper: Red, Vermilion
Swordfish (imported)
Tilapia (Asia farmed)
Tilefish (US Southeast)
Tuna: All Canned, Albacore, Skipjack,
Tongol (except troll/pole)
Tuna: Bigeye, Yellowfin (longline, except US Atlantic)
Tuna: Bluefin

Fish & Seafood with Bill & Sheila

If you require a high quality printout of this article, just click on the printer symbol next to ’Share and enjoy’, and we will do the rest.

Get the best website builder available anywhere –SBI! Lick here for more information


seafood

Return from seafood to Home Page


If you want to increase your site popularity and gain thousands of visitors – check out these sites THEY ARE FREE. Spanishchef more than doubled its ‘New Visitors’ last month simply by signing up to these sites:
facebook likes google exchange
Ex4Me
Likerr.eu
GetLikeHits.com
Ex4Me

Follow spanishchef.net on TWITTER

Recommended Reading

Gulf seafood safe despite oil spill concerns, FDA says

free web site traffic and promotion

fish

seafood

Gulf seafood safe despite oil spill concerns, FDA says

WASHINGTON — Photos of seafood with sores may raise concern about long-term environmental effects of the massive BP oil spill — but federal health officials say the Gulf seafood that’s on the market is safe to eat.

After all, diseased fish aren’t allowed to be sold, said Dr. Robert W. Dickey, who heads the Food and Drug Administration’s Gulf Coast Seafood Laboratory.

“It’s important to emphasize that we’re talking about a low percentage of fish,” Dickey stressed. “It doesn’t represent a seafood safety hazard.”

Two years after the oil spill, scientists cite lesions and other deformities in some Gulf fish as a sign of lingering environmental damage. They can’t say for sure what’s causing the fish ailments or if there really are more sick fish today than in the past.

As marine biologists study the threats to the fish, here are some questions and answers about the safety of seafood:

Q: What keeps sick fish off the market?

A: Every wholesaler and seafood processor must follow longstanding FDA rules on what constitutes a safe and usable catch. Fish with lesions or signs of parasites or other disease aren’t allowed, Dickey said.

Q: What about oil contamination that’s not visible?

A: Federal and state laboratories tested more than 10,000 fish, shrimp and other animals for traces of certain chemicals in oil to be sure they were far below levels that could make anyone sick before commercial fishing ever was allowed to resume. Gulf Coast states are continuing that testing today as a precaution. Some species clear oil contaminants from their bodies more rapidly than others, the reason that fishing resumed before the oyster harvest. The FDA says that someone could eat 9 pounds of fish or 5 pounds of oyster meat a day for five years and still not reach the levels of concern for a key set of chemicals.

Q: But what about the oil compounds that scientists have reported finding in the bile of some fish?

A: Bile shows what a fish recently ate, but the fish’s digestive system goes on to process and eliminate contaminants so they don’t build up in edible tissue, Dickey said.

Q: Are there other reasons to pay attention to seafood safety?

A: Definitely. A California company recently recalled some yellowfin tuna used to make sushi because it was linked to an outbreak of salmonella food poisoning. And every year, health officials warn people with certain health conditions to avoid eating raw oysters — they may be contaminated with the Vibrio vulnificus bacteria that typically is found in warm coastal waters between April and October.

Fish & Seafood with Bill & Sheila

If you require a high quality printout of this article, just click on the printer symbol next to ’Share and enjoy’, and we will do the rest.

Get the best website builder available anywhere –SBI! Lick here for more information


seafood

Return from seafood to Home Page


If you want to increase your site popularity and gain thousands of visitors – check out these sites THEY ARE FREE. Spanishchef more than doubled its ‘New Visitors’ last month simply by signing up to these sites:
facebook likes google exchange
Ex4Me
Likerr.eu
GetLikeHits.com
Ex4Me


Follow spanishchef.net on TWITTER

Recommended Reading

Wild Seafood: An Unlikely Key to Combating Climate Change

free web site traffic and promotion
seafood

Wild Seafood: An Unlikely Key to Combating Climate Change

Here’s some food for thought on this upcoming Earth Day: Agriculture is the leading contributor to greenhouse gas emissions in the world. It even beats out transportation. The food we raise, especially meat like pork, beef and chicken, is contributing more to climate change than the cars and SUVs that clog our freeways. That’s not to say we should let our gas guzzling habits off the hook, but it does mean that we should look at our carbon footprint holistically — including the food we consume.

But people must eat. And we need protein, right? So really, this conversation isn’t worth having unless there’s another option, another animal protein out there that contributes less to global warming. Well, guess what? There is.

It’s called wild seafood.

Before we can fully understand the benefits of this undervalued food source, it’s important to dissect the impact that pork, beef, poultry, and lamb have on our already stressed planet.

Let’s break down the numbers. On average, Americans eat nearly 275 pounds of meat per year. We’re number two world-wide — Denmark is number one, at an incredible 321 pounds of meat per capita. Pork is the most popular meat worldwide, followed by poultry and then beef. The U.S. is home to around 60 million pigs and they produce more than 21 billion pounds of meat each year. The world’s largest slaughterhouse, in North Carolina, processes 32,000 pigs per day.

In order to raise these pigs, they must be fed. And like all living things, what goes in must come out. This waste alone releases vast amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere — a potent mix of 60 to 70 percent methane and 30 to 40 percent carbon dioxide. Methane traps twenty-three times more heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide and that’s one of the reasons why agriculture is the world’s single biggest contributor to global warming. We’re not talking about a little waste here, either. The 10 million pigs in North Carolina for instance, create more sewage than the residents of North Carolina, California, Pennsylvania, New York, Texas, New Hampshire, and North Dakota combined. Most of this waste isn’t processed. It’s kept in open-air lagoons that pump out greenhouse gases into the atmosphere like it’s going out of style.

The McKinsey Institute has estimated that we’ll need to increase water and land availability by 140 and 250 percent, respectively, in the next two decades to meet the growing demand for food. Doing so — with our business as usual model that includes processing incredible amounts livestock — won’t be cheap or good for our Earth. Meeting this demand would pump 66 gigatons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, which could cause temperatures to rise by five degrees Celsius in the next eighty years. Even an increase in temperature at a fraction of that would devastate regions where poor farmers rely on rain-fed agriculture to feed their families.

But we can drastically improve our chances of battling climate change if we start thinking seriously about wild seafood. Better yet, it is truly one of the world’s most renewable resources. It doesn’t take a million years to replace fish, like coal or oil. Wild seafood, properly managed, can replenish itself year by year, decade by decade, millennia by millennia.

The potential that wild seafood has to feed the world, however, isn’t something we can take for granted. Despite the resiliency of our oceans, we’ve done a terrible job at keeping them healthy and abundant. We are literally fishing our oceans into oblivion — catching fish more quickly than they can reproduce to support their populations, destroying ocean nurseries and habitat, not controlling bycatch. As a result, global fish catch has declined since the late 1980s despite more and more boats on the water. Seafood can be a healthy, low-impact protein, but only if we are good stewards of the oceans.

On Earth Day, it’s important to remember that our blue planet can still help to sustain us, if we let it.

If you require a high quality printout of this article, just click on the printer symbol next to ’Share and enjoy’, and we will do the rest.


Get the best website builder available anywhere –SBI! Lick here for more information


seefood

Return from seafood to Home Page


If you want to increase your site popularity and gain thousands of visitors – check out these sites THEY ARE FREE. Spanishchef more than doubled its ‘New Visitors’ last month simply by signing up to these sites:
facebook likes google exchange
Ex4Me
Likerr.eu
GetLikeHits.com
Ex4Me

Follow spanishchef.net on TWITTER

Recommended Reading

Seafood Fraud

free web site traffic and promotion
seafood

Seafood Fraud

Several restaurants and grocery stores in the South Bay have been mislabeling seafood, according to an ocean conservancy nonprofit study released Tuesday.

The study, conducted by Oceana in May and December 2011, found that about 55 percent of seafood samples collected from local restaurants, sushi bars and grocery stores did not meet federal labeling guidelines.

Sampling locations in the South Bay included Manhattan Beach, El Segundo, Marina del Rey, Redondo Beach, Torrance, Palos Verdes and Long Beach. Red snapper was the most commonly mislabeled fish, which often was actually tilapia, perch, rockfish or bream.

The most egregious cases were at sushi restaurants, where nine out of 10 of those sampled in Southern California substituted white tuna with escolar, a mackerel species that has purgative effects, according to the study.

The majority of mislabelled seafood Oceana found, 45 percent at restaurants and 31 percent at grocery stores, were lower quality species passed off for more expensive ones.

“Consumers are being asked to guess what they are eating,” said Dr. Kimberly Warner, senior scientist at Oceana, in a statement. “The public should be provided with more information about the food they are purchasing. With such high levels of mislabeling, it is more important than ever for the government to increase inspections and require traceability of our seafood.”

Oceana has sponsored Senate Bill 1486, introduced by California Sen. Ted W. Lieu, D-Torrance, which would require food facilities to properly identify seafood and would impose a fine from $50 to $500 on those out of compliance.

However, the state would not fine facilities whose suppliers provided them with inaccurate information.

“The extent of seafood fraud found in California should be shocking to consumers, especially those that are paying extra for seafood they think is healthier and more sustainable,” said Geoff Shester, California program director at Oceana, in a statement. “If enacted, this bill would provide a powerful first step to help turn the tide on seafood fraud.”

When introduced in February, SB 1486 originally included language that would have required sellers to state the seafood’s country of origin, but that provision was redacted on Monday. The U.S. imports about 84 percent of its seafood, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, and only 2 percent of it is inspected.

Fore more information about the study and seafood fraud, visit www.oceana.org/fraud

Fish & Seafood with Bill & Sheila

____________________________________________________________________
If you require a high quality printout of this article, just click on the printer symbol next to ’Share and enjoy’, and we will do the rest. This site is hosted by (click on the graphic for more information)seafood

Return from seafood to Home Page


If you want to increase your site popularity and gain thousands of visitors – check out these sites THEY ARE FREE. Spanishchef more than doubled its ‘New Visitors’ last month simply by signing up to these sites:
facebook likes google exchange
Ex4Me
Likerr.eu
GetLikeHits.com
Ex4Me

Follow spanishchef.net on TWITTER

Recommended Reading