Indoor cooking stoves kill 2 million yearly: study

Indoor cooking stoves kill 2 million yearly: study

Primitive cooking stoves are used throughout half the world and kill more people per year — about two million — than malaria, said a study published in the United States on Thursday.

Three billion people worldwide cooki indoors by burning solid fuels such as wood, charcoal or dung, yet little public awareness surrounds what the World Health Organization describes as the globe’s top environmental killer.

The smoke that pours from these unvented cooking fires fills indoor spaces and causes pneumonia and chronic lung disease that particularly affects women and children who tend to spend more time in the home while men are outside working.

More research and programs to sell more efficient cookstoves to residents in remote or impoverished areas could help improve health and allow girls to get educated rather than spend time gathering fuel, said the research in the journal Science.

“Many people in developed countries don’t realize that smoke from indoor cooking fires is a terrible scourge upon the health of a large number of people,” said co-author Francis Collins, director of the US National Institutes of Health.

“International efforts to combat this scourge are now beginning. The NIH‘s role is to support the research that will determine the most efficient, cost-effective means to do so while safe guarding human health.”

One program in the Andean highlands of Peru has had some success. In that area, where about 30 percent of the Peruvian population lives (10 million people), 40 percent of women have heart and chronic obstructive lung diseases.

In addition, up to 60 percent of children are malnourished and suffer “relentless respiratory diseases,” said an accompanying editorial by Peru’s former first lady Pilar Nores Bodereau.

She founded a program called Sembrando, a private initiative that helps local members of the community build better cooking stoves, latrines and grow family orchards, all at a cost of about 200 US dollars per family.

In the past five years, the project has served 92,000 families, or about 500,000 people in the Andes, and early studies show a “substantial decrease in bronchopulmonary diseases and a clear increase in the height/weight ratio of children under five years old,” she wrote.

The project has “inspired the Peruvian government to start a campaign to build 500,000 clean cookstoves nationwide,” she added.

The United Nations Foundation has launched its own public-private partnership to establish a market for clean and efficient cookng stoves and fuels in the developing world, called the Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves.

Its goal is to have 100 million homes using cleaner cookstoves and fuels by 2020. More than 175 countries, foundations, corporations, and other nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are involved.

The study in Science said the US government “has committed more than $50 million, including about $25 million of the NIH’s ongoing research funds” toward studying the impact of indoor air pollution from cooking fires.

Between $150 and $200 million is needed for a comprehensive research program on how much pollution reduction is needed to see a health improvement, as well as the benefits of current efforts to use better cooking stoves, said the study.

In addition, the UN program does not aim to give stoves away for free, even though the people who need them are already quite poor.

“A cooking stove purchased by the consumer is inherently more valued than one that is received without charge, especially if the free stove was designed without consumer input,” said the study.

Cooking oil thefts

Cooking-oil theft is on the rise as the evolving biodiesel market has led to an increase in its value, according to Detective Crystal Nosal, an Arlington police spokeswoman.

“Police departments in the region are becoming more involved to remedy this problem,” Nosal said.

Industry insiders say the Ballston arrests mark a major breakthrough in combating an emerging form of commodity theft.

“It’s a brand-new crime,” said Steve Blankenship, regional manager of Charlottesville-based Greenlight Biofuels, which buys used oil from restaurants. “And it’s happening on an unbelievable scale.” He said the cooking oil can sell on the street for as much as $4 per gallon.

Fa De Zheng, 36, of Oxon Hill and Ming Gang Lu, 38, of New York were charged with grand larceny and related charges on Oct. 7. Police say they were breaking into an oil container used by a client of Greenlight Biofuels.

At least four restaurants serviced by Greenlight Biofuels have been hit, police said.

In recent years, companies have been buying used oil and converting it into biodiesel fuel, a petroleum diesel alternative that can be used in diesel engines.

According to Blankenship, the cooking oil can also be converted into animal feed. Firms in that business pay more for the oil than biodiesel firms, he said.

Blankenship said his company has been losing about 20,000 gallons a month, or 5 to 10 percent of its business. He said the thefts have been happening for years but have increased significantly in recent months. The company learns the oil is stolen when it goes to collect it.

Greenlight Biofuels hired private investigators and engaged several area police departments — some of which did not take him seriously at first, Blankenship said.

“We’ve been actively trying to solve this for some time now, and we recently got traction,” he said.

Blankenship said about 10 companies in the area buy used cooking oil.

Arlington police said Greenlight Biofuels contacted investigators in September but reported that thefts have been a major problem since March. Arlington detectives began watching the cooking oil deposits and caught the thieves in the act last week, they said.

“This is a huge relief for us,” Blankenship said.


This site is hosted by (click on the graphic for more information)cooking

Return to Home Page

Cooking oil: Put it down the drain or in the compost bin?

Cooking oil: Put it down the drain or in the compost bin?

Dilemma: I have cooking oil that’s gone rancid. Do I pour it into the compost bin or send it down the sink drain?

Of course I’ll: Pour it into the compost bin. It’s food, after all.

Trade-off: As smelly and messy as the green bin is now, the oil is just going to make it worse.

Then I’ll: Pour the oil down the sink.

Trade-off: I don’t want to risk clogging the pipes.

Experts say: The East Bay Municipal Utility District sounds the alarm about this one on its website: “Cooking oil and grease poured down drains can build up in pipes causing backups at home, into streets and the storm drain system. … Overflows can pose health and environmental hazards, polluting local creeks and San Francisco Bay.” That’s even if you use hot water, detergents or garbage disposals. For its part, the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission estimates that unclogging pipes stopped up by used cooking oils costs the city more than $3.5 million each year.

But pouring the oil into the compost bin isn’t necessarily the answer either. Darby Hoover, senior resource specialist for the Natural Resources Defense Council, says, “In home compost bins, cooking oils in quantity can attract animals.” Oils also make it hard for oxygen to get through, which means your pile will probably become anaerobic rather than aerobic. She says that while anaerobic home compost will still break down eventually, “it takes longer and smells worse while it’s happening – you know it’s anaerobic if it’s slimy and smells.”

Verdict: Never pour the oil down the sink. The best course of action is to check out one of the local grease recycling programs like SFGreasecycle, which tries to turn residential fats, oil and grease into biofuel (bit.ly/oEhM0Q) and EBMUD’s residential cooking oil and grease drop-off locations (bit.ly/qllznq).

Robert Reed, spokesman for Recology, the company that processes household waste in San Francisco, suggests collecting fat from frying bacon or hamburgers into an empty soup or coffee can. “It wouldn’t make sense to make a trip and burn gasoline just to take in a small amount of household cooking oil, but saving it until you have a significant quantity and taking it in when you are going to be in the vicinity of an authorized drop-off would be efficient and allow the oil to be processed into biodiesel,” Reed says.

Alternatively, a few Bay Area municipalities, including San Francisco among them, can process small quantities – a tablespoon or three per household – of cooking oil in compost. Hoover recommends mixing the oil with something that will absorb it, like food-soiled paper or leaves, before putting it in the green bin.

Have a eco-dilemma for the Green Scale? Send it to [email protected].

This article appeared on page M – 7 of the San Francisco Chronicle

Planes to fly on cooking oil

Planes to use cooking oil for fuel

Is it fair to imagine that some people just don’t want to know about how certain things are done? If they did, perhaps their irrational side might overwhelm the blinkered side that helps them get through each and every painful day.

Does everyone want to know, for example, that the Boeing 737 in which they are strapped is flying on the detritus of some very fine french fries?

In the last few days, KLM and Thomson Airways, two European airlines, announced that they would be flying a plane or two using cooking oil.

In KLM’s case, the BBC reported that no fewer than 200 flights between Amsterdam and the home of cooking, Paris, will be powered by biokerosene. This fine fuel happens partly to emerge from the ashes of used frying oil.

cooking

Cooking oil, anyone?

(Credit:

CC Wyzik/Flickr)

Thomson announced this week that it would use the very same fuel–an even 50-50 mixture of Jet A1 fuel and hydro-processed esters and fatty acids (HEFA) on, according to the Telegraph, a flight from Birmingham, England, to Palma, Majorca.

Of course, the theory behind this fuel is that it will reduce carbon emissions. And experiments with such biofuels have been going on for some time. For example, Air New Zealand flew a 747 partly on old cooking oil back in 2008.

I know the more technically minded will throw their arms up in the air and raise their eyebrows beyond their tattooed foreheads when I suggest that not everyone might immediately want to know all this. Not everyone will feel comfortable that their plane is flying on gallons of old extra virgin that might have been used to saute carrots.

I fancy that those who already find flying a trying experience might not want to imagine that their plane has suddenly been co-opted into the food chain.

If airlines truly feel the need to advertise their green credentials, perhaps they should consider giving each of these cooked-up flights a cooking theme.

Perhaps they could serve food within them that has been prepared with the same cooking oil. Or perhaps they could at least release a pleasant cooking odor into the planes, so that nervous passengers can bathe in the smells of home cooking, while the leftovers are being used to fly the plane to Paris.

One should never underestimate humanity’s ability to be afraid, nor its openness to suggestion.


Food & Cooking with Bill & Sheila